|
Women should know After taking an antibiotic in May 1994 for bronchitis, I started to experience itchiness and burning sensation around the vulva. I was prescribed seven different creams, over a period of four months, for fungal infection (usual side effects of antibiotics) plus an antifungal pill that is prescribed to AIDS patients (Fluconazole) without any results. After all these treatments that lasted from June to September, I was told by my GP that I had recurrent vaginitis and needed to see a specialist. I finally got an appointment for the beginning of December. This gynecologist cancelled all December appointments and I was rescheduled for the end of January. I couldn't see myself waiting so long and suffering all this time. In the meantime, I tried everything in the book in terms of "natural
medicine" (useful methods in case of a "real yeast infection");
went through the very tough antifungal diet "MEVY" (meat, eggs,
green vegetables and plain yogurt) for a month and no wheat products for
three months; homeopathy for two months while on MEVY; acupuncture while
on homeopathy and MEVY what I call putting all the chances on your side;
Golden Seal treatment for two weeks after obtaining no result from anything
else; the "caprylic acid-lactobacillus bifidus-psyllium-bentonite:
treatment that is so awful to take I will not describe it to you; the
"taheebo tea" douches. I finally saw a gynecologist for what my GP was unsuccessfully treating me for the last six months, recurrent vaginitis. Well, after more than $500 worth of creams and different treatments, from homeopathy to "the Yeast Syndrome Diet", he told me that I probably never had any yeast infection since all my lab tests were negative. According to him, I'm suffering from vestibulitis (of the vulva).The cause is unknown but it appears that women who react to certain antibiotics (which is my case for penicillin and amitriptyline), pre-menopausal women and others could have vestibulitis. It is the thinning of the vaginal walls at the entrance (vestibule) that is the culprit. The walls being thinner, the veins are ore exposed and break easily. As a result, it burns and itches as if one had an infection. It can go undiagnosed, or diagnosed as a yeast infection, for years, which makes the use of all these expensive creams not only useless but painful. They can also aggravate the situation by keeping the area constantly irritated. The remedy is simple and quite rapid. Conjugated estrogens (Premarin) are used at night intravaginally to thicken the vaginal walls. The normal dose is 5 grams a day, but after I told him how sensitive to medication I was, he went down to 2 grams. After two days of trying that dose, and suffering from mild migraines and dizziness, I went down to 1 gram a day. It seems to work well for me since the side effects are gone, as well as the pain and burning sensation I've been having for the last six months. He also prescribed a cream Hydrocortisone, to be applied topically three times a day. I do it twice a day. The doctor said that he could not link vestibulitis to CMT but often sees vein problems arise when there is weakness of the muscles (diverticulosis, hemorrhoids, varicose veins, etc.). Could this be the new illness of the 90s! Following is an October 1996 update from C.C.: Finally - the right doctor and a cure Doctor #1 said it was vaginitis and prescribed seven different creams over a period of three months, even if the yeast tests were always negative. She then sent me to se a gynecologist, but since I could only have an appointment six months later, I went to our local university clinic and saw doctor #2 who sent me to a gynecologist. This one thought it could be caused by a different sexually transmitted disease and had a series of tests performed. All of them came back negative (I've been with the same partner for the last 16 years but he did not want to take any chance!). He then said I was suffering from vestibulitis and prescribed estrogen and cortisone. When I questioned the side effects of that deadly cocktail, he reminded me that he was a specialist, and if I did not want to follow his advice, I would have to find another doctor, which I did. Last January, after 19 months of pain (sometimes excruciating) and frustrations, I finally found Dr. Faraci, a gynecologist here in Ottawa, who is secure/confident enough with herself to listen to her patients and even to accept their suggestions/leads. The fact that I had all the symptoms of menopause at 38 (which is not abnormal but unusual given my mother started hers at 53 and my five older sisters, aged 40 to 51, were still as regular as a clock) made me wonder if CMT could be involved somehow. My theory was related to two hormones and LH (I can't remember exactly what it stands for, and since I lost all my medical related books and notes in the flood of August 8 yes, we had 27" of sewer water in our basement I cannot be more precise for the time being). Dr. Faraci performed a series of tests (many of which were done to eliminate
other possible causes or other illnesses that could mimic the same symptoms)
and came to the conclusion that, given the very low level of these two
hormones in my body, my hypothalamus is probably affected by CMT. Since
these hormones are sent through nerve conductivity to the ovaries to produce
estrogen and progesterone, the ovaries stopped producing these hormones
which explained why I was starting my menopause so strongly and so young
and why the membranes of my vagina, anus and mouth were so dry, cracking,
burning, etc., and why I was always so tired. It is called hypogonadism'
and is controlled with HRT (hormone replacement therapy). I take a minimal
dose of estrogen for 31 days (a month) and of progesterone 10 days a month.
I had a few side effects at first (headaches, nausea, feeling down). Except
for four days a month (few side effects like PMS), I now feel like new'
(or almost, I'm now 41 after all!). In February 1997 C.C. wrote: When she first put me on progesterone in January '96, she prescribed them for seven days a month (day 16 to 22) and gave me a repeat for three months. To renew them, and for the follow-up, I had to go back to my GP. My GP told me that they were to be taken for 10 and not seven days (day 16 to 25). I read the Information for the Prometrium Consumer document attached to the pill container and it was written that I had to take them for 14 days. I accepted what the GP said and went on to take them for 10 days. What a mistake! Starting day five of the second month, I started to experience all kinds of symptoms, like breast pain, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, headaches and depressive mood. I looked yellow whenever I was looking at myself in the mirror but did not pay much attention to it. When I saw her in the summer for a renewal of my prescription I talked to her about these symptoms. She said that these symptoms were related to the fact that I was depressed and referred me instead to a psychiatrist. I had the power to refuse but instead I agreed with her diagnosis since I was crying more often than usual, I was more tired than usual, etc. I'm so glad I did go. I'm also glad that I'm continuing to give myself the gift of psychotherapy. I see my psychiatrist every two weeks. From day one, I made it clear to him that I was not to take any mood altering pills and he's never insisted on pushing one on me since. This therapy allows me to vent my feelings (positive and negative) related to CMT and its numerous grieving steps that we all have to go through since it is an evolving illness. It also gives a break to my very supportive husband, who sometimes has more than his share of the consequences of CMT, and to my friends and family. When I saw my GP for my annual checkup, my cholesterol tests came back completely out of whack. My LDL (bad cholesterol) has always been on the high side of the normal scale, but this time not only was it much higher but my HDL (good cholesterol,) which is usually very high, came back very low. According to her, I had no choice but to take a medication to lower it. I was in her office to talk about side effects of my progesterone and the only thing she could do was to prescribe me another pill. I was so depressed and annoyed when I heard her talk so nonchalantly about another pill to take for the rest of my life I literally cried in front of her (it was also day six of my Prometrium). I asked her to look at the broad picture instead of her usual way (and most GPs' way) of a symptom, a pill another symptom, another pill. She said that I had no choice. Useless to say how furious I was when I left her office. In hindsight, I realize I was crying more out of anger and powerlessness
than out of sadness. To top it off, she said that according to the manufacturer,
Prometrium should be taken 14 days. She also mentioned that since I had
so many side effects with it, I should consider having my uterus and my
ovaries removed. If we had to remove every part of our body every time
we encounter a problem, I know one head that should come out soon, and
it is not mine! When I saw Dr. Faraci, I mentioned my symptoms. As soon as I said the
words "my skin looks yellow," her diagnosis was out and clear
my
liver, which is already weak, is supposed to process the progesterone
but it is not doing its job. This explains why the symptoms that were
minor at first became worse every month. She immediately ordered a lab
test for my liver, thyroid gland, etc. I also mentioned to her the result
of my research that related high cholesterol level to HRT. She confirmed
my doubts
my HDL was lowered and LDL increased as a consequence of
taking some progesterone, which is a common side effect of that hormone. According to Dr. Faraci, progesterone is not for me. I will continue
to take the estrogen and she will monitor my uterus and ovaries every
six months. Besides the annual pap test, she will perform regular ultrasounds.
According to what I read -- and she gave me the same statistics -- one
woman in 100 has a chance to have uterus or ovarian cancer by the time
she reaches the age of 80. With progesterone and estrogen, this figure
remains the same but it jumps to six to eight per 100 when the woman takes
estrogen alone. At 41, I prefer to take that risk that I still consider
minimal, knowing that I will be closely monitored, rather than worsening
my already weak liver. As she said, it is much easier to remove a uterus
and ovaries than to replace a liver.
|